<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CSS transitions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tekkie.flashbit.net/css/css-transitions/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tekkie.flashbit.net/css/css-transitions</link>
	<description>Flash technology blog</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 21:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Spence</title>
		<link>http://tekkie.flashbit.net/css/css-transitions#comment-227</link>
		<dc:creator>Spence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 17:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tekkie.flashbit.net/css/css-transitions#comment-227</guid>
		<description>This is interesting. It doesn't work in firefox or IE, but it sounds like it'll be pretty big once it does. I work with flash sometimes, and one of the best things about flash is the feel of an instant update. Obviously, this is being implemented in Java Applets, so count that out. The ActionScript looks like it's going to be replaced with CSS and PHP. Flash's advantages are being taken out left and right. One thing that Adobe is working on, is getting the texts to be readable by Google and other search engines to solve the SEO problem. I once thought flash was the future, but now I'm having some second thoughts. I know some PHP and CSS, I started working with Java Applet just recently. The biggest downfall of flash is that you can't really manipulate the entire page, unless the entire page is done in flash. I don't like to do that. I like using flash in different parts of the site for things like style pickers for a user's profile, or a music player. I don't think all of FlashPlayer's functions will be replaced until at least 5-10 years. (More leaning towards 5)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is interesting. It doesn&#8217;t work in firefox or IE, but it sounds like it&#8217;ll be pretty big once it does. I work with flash sometimes, and one of the best things about flash is the feel of an instant update. Obviously, this is being implemented in Java Applets, so count that out. The ActionScript looks like it&#8217;s going to be replaced with CSS and PHP. Flash&#8217;s advantages are being taken out left and right. One thing that Adobe is working on, is getting the texts to be readable by Google and other search engines to solve the SEO problem. I once thought flash was the future, but now I&#8217;m having some second thoughts. I know some PHP and CSS, I started working with Java Applet just recently. The biggest downfall of flash is that you can&#8217;t really manipulate the entire page, unless the entire page is done in flash. I don&#8217;t like to do that. I like using flash in different parts of the site for things like style pickers for a user&#8217;s profile, or a music player. I don&#8217;t think all of FlashPlayer&#8217;s functions will be replaced until at least 5-10 years. (More leaning towards 5)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://tekkie.flashbit.net/css/css-transitions#comment-188</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 09:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tekkie.flashbit.net/css/css-transitions#comment-188</guid>
		<description>This stuff needs to be added to if not the css 3 then at least the next css standard. Thats amazing, i have been waiting for the day when css will replace flash for years, i hope that day is getting closer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This stuff needs to be added to if not the css 3 then at least the next css standard. Thats amazing, i have been waiting for the day when css will replace flash for years, i hope that day is getting closer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Hester</title>
		<link>http://tekkie.flashbit.net/css/css-transitions#comment-124</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Hester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tekkie.flashbit.net/css/css-transitions#comment-124</guid>
		<description>Interesting stuff! No Flash required! But can you make the second example work on every click? I was disappointed I could only watch the animation once. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting stuff! No Flash required! But can you make the second example work on every click? I was disappointed I could only watch the animation once. <img src='http://tekkie.flashbit.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Dybdahl Ahle</title>
		<link>http://tekkie.flashbit.net/css/css-transitions#comment-103</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Dybdahl Ahle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 10:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tekkie.flashbit.net/css/css-transitions#comment-103</guid>
		<description>Many nonbrowser applications use webkit as an easy way to do advanced rendering.
Do anybody know if this css transitions stuff will let me move objects around by setting top:y; left:x ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many nonbrowser applications use webkit as an easy way to do advanced rendering.<br />
Do anybody know if this css transitions stuff will let me move objects around by setting top:y; left:x ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ain Tohvri</title>
		<link>http://tekkie.flashbit.net/css/css-transitions#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Ain Tohvri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 07:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tekkie.flashbit.net/css/css-transitions#comment-37</guid>
		<description>The above mentioned properties validate. Please see the &lt;a href="http://tekkie.flashbit.net/tmp/css3_validation.html" title="Cascading Style Sheets Level 3 validation sample" rel="nofollow"&gt;CSS3 sample file&lt;/a&gt;.

By my knowledge there is no way to write conditional style sheets for Safari.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The above mentioned properties validate. Please see the <a href="http://tekkie.flashbit.net/tmp/css3_validation.html" title="Cascading Style Sheets Level 3 validation sample" rel="nofollow">CSS3 sample file</a>.</p>
<p>By my knowledge there is no way to write conditional style sheets for Safari.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Hopkins</title>
		<link>http://tekkie.flashbit.net/css/css-transitions#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>David Hopkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 21:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tekkie.flashbit.net/css/css-transitions#comment-35</guid>
		<description>One little problem with using CSS3 propriety attributes is that they are invalid. I don't know if you can have conditional Safari stylesheets like you can with IE?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One little problem with using CSS3 propriety attributes is that they are invalid. I don&#8217;t know if you can have conditional Safari stylesheets like you can with IE?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ain Tohvri</title>
		<link>http://tekkie.flashbit.net/css/css-transitions#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Ain Tohvri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 16:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tekkie.flashbit.net/css/css-transitions#comment-29</guid>
		<description>I fully agree with David. 

There are a number of arguments against all of it. In circumstances they involve Internet Explorer that is in fact holding back innovation. No matter how hard Mr Hyatt works it into the standards if no one really takes it to the end user. 

So here's a call for the developers – use &lt;a href="http://tekkie.flashbit.net/tag/css" rel="nofollow"&gt;Cascading Style Sheets&lt;/a&gt;. At the latest level possible for a project. At some point it will make a difference and it doesn't actually hurt to introduce some &lt;a href="http://tekkie.flashbit.net/tag/css3" rel="nofollow"&gt;CSS3&lt;/a&gt; like &lt;a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-color/#transparency" title="CSS3 Color Module" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;code&gt;opacity&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/CR-css3-text-20030514/#text-shadows" title="CSS3 Text Module" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;code&gt;text-shadow&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fully agree with David. </p>
<p>There are a number of arguments against all of it. In circumstances they involve Internet Explorer that is in fact holding back innovation. No matter how hard Mr Hyatt works it into the standards if no one really takes it to the end user. </p>
<p>So here&#8217;s a call for the developers – use <a href="http://tekkie.flashbit.net/tag/css" rel="nofollow">Cascading Style Sheets</a>. At the latest level possible for a project. At some point it will make a difference and it doesn&#8217;t actually hurt to introduce some <a href="http://tekkie.flashbit.net/tag/css3" rel="nofollow">CSS3</a> like <a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-color/#transparency" title="CSS3 Color Module" rel="nofollow"><code>opacity</code></a> or <a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/CR-css3-text-20030514/#text-shadows" title="CSS3 Text Module" rel="nofollow"><code>text-shadow</code></a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Hopkins</title>
		<link>http://tekkie.flashbit.net/css/css-transitions#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>David Hopkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 11:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tekkie.flashbit.net/css/css-transitions#comment-26</guid>
		<description>Chances are that at some point something along the lines of these transitions will be added to CSS. Webkit have made more headway than anyone else with CSS, so it is likely that the W3C will take their ideas seriously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chances are that at some point something along the lines of these transitions will be added to CSS. Webkit have made more headway than anyone else with CSS, so it is likely that the W3C will take their ideas seriously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ain Tohvri</title>
		<link>http://tekkie.flashbit.net/css/css-transitions#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Ain Tohvri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 07:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tekkie.flashbit.net/css/css-transitions#comment-25</guid>
		<description>Joe: as stated above the functionality works only in the latest nightly of &lt;a href="http://nightly.webkit.org/" rel="nofollow"&gt;WebKit&lt;/a&gt;.

&lt;a href="http://tekkie.flashbit.net/tag/webkit" title="WebKit articles" rel="nofollow"&gt;More on WebKit&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe: as stated above the functionality works only in the latest nightly of <a href="http://nightly.webkit.org/" rel="nofollow">WebKit</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://tekkie.flashbit.net/tag/webkit" title="WebKit articles" rel="nofollow">More on WebKit</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Williams</title>
		<link>http://tekkie.flashbit.net/css/css-transitions#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 03:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tekkie.flashbit.net/css/css-transitions#comment-24</guid>
		<description>Fade?? what fade. this ain't working</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fade?? what fade. this ain&#8217;t working</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
